Week 11 Discussion

/in /by

Consider, for example, what criteria are used in your discipline (Health Science) to evaluate alignment of research components. And in what way will your future research contribute to your identity as scholar-practitioner who is dedicated to positive social change?For this Discussion, you will consider criteria for evaluating alignment among the various components of a research study. You will also reflect on your role as a positive social change agent through research.With these thoughts in mind:Write an explanation of the criteria you could use to evaluate alignment between data collection methods and other research components, such as the problem, purpose, research questions, and design. Then, reflecting on the course content, discuss the extent to which your newly acquired research knowledge and skills can support your role as an agent of positive social change. Be specific and provide an example(s).Be sure to support your Main Issue Post and Response Post with reference to the week’s Learning Resources and other scholarly evidence in APA Style.ResourcesWalden University. (2015b). Social change. Retrieved from http://www.waldenu.edu/about/social-changeVogt, W. P., Gardner, D. C., & Haeffele, L. M. (2012). When to use what research design. New York, NY: Guilford Press.

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get 10% Discount! Use Code "Newclient"

NUR-631-D1Q1R2

/in /by

Minimum of 250 words with at least 2 peer review reference in APA formatIs there a connection between epigentic-related changes and cellular changes?

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get 10% Discount! Use Code "Newclient"

Chapter 27 week 5

/in /by

Please answer ONE of the following DQ’s.  Please provide the questions that is being answered as the heading.  Incomplete answers will be marked as “0.”APA style and 3 references.Chapter 27A patient with chronic bronchitis is brought into the emergency room with complaints of sudden-onset chest pain, shortness of breath, and coughing up blood. His lab work shows hypoxemia, respiratory acidosis, and elevated red blood cell (RBC) count, white blood cell count, hemoglobin, and hematocrit.a.            Utilizing your understanding of the process of erythropoiesis, why do you think this patient has elevated RBCs, hemoglobin, and hematocrit?b.            What is the most likely cause of the patient’s acute symptoms? How do you explain this?

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get 10% Discount! Use Code "Newclient"

Healthcare Exploration and Careers Module One Discussion

/in /by

Research what a single-payer healthcare system is and the differences of this delivery model to the current American healthcare system delivery model and its service-for-fee payment setup. Are one of these systems better than the other? Why or why not? Do you think a single-payer healthcare system in the U.S. would work and be better for U.S. citizens? Why or why not? Finally, what do you think needs to happen to improve the delivery model of the American healthcare system? Make sure you back up your opinions with research.

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get 10% Discount! Use Code "Newclient"

templet

/in /by

Topic:  Priority Action to Promote Adherence to Treatmentplease give me 3 critical points on this topic and fill  the templet uploaded below on the given topic.APA reference

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get 10% Discount! Use Code "Newclient"

Discussion week 10

/in /by

this discussion, you are asked to review the student learning outcomes for this course and discuss how you met these outcomes. The intention here is to provide you an opportunity to “reflect” on the learning achieved during this term and how you successfully met these learning outcomes. If you do not feel you successfully met the objective, discuss your plans to successfully complete the objective in the future.Upon completion of this course, the student should be able to:Critically analyze current practice to formulate researchable problems.Evaluate research as the basis for decision-making to improve outcomes through translation into evidence-based practice.Synthesize an understanding of the research process through development of a proposal to address a nursing problem or focus area identified in nursing practice.Investigate ethical issues related to the conduct of scientific research, including informed consent, data management, data analysis, and protection of human subjects.Explore national and international initiatives and research priorities.

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get 10% Discount! Use Code "Newclient"

WK 7 Discussion post

/in /by

Please see attachment for instructions

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get 10% Discount! Use Code "Newclient"

Madelaine M. Leninger theory of cultural care diversity and universality; charpter 22

/in /by

Read Chapter 22 in Alligood (2022).Describe some difficulties you have experienced with patients you think are related to cultural differences.

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get 10% Discount! Use Code "Newclient"

Week 8 NURS 6050 Discussion Board

/in /by

To Prepare:Revisit the Congress.gov website and consider the role of RNs and APRNs in policy-making.Reflect on potential opportunities that may exist for RNs and APRNs to participate in the policy-making process.The AssignmentPost an explanation of at least two opportunities that exist for RNs and APRNs to actively participate inpolicy-making. Explain some of the challenges that these opportunities may present and describe how you might overcome these challenges. Finally, recommend two strategies you might make to better advocate for or communicate the existence of these opportunities to participate in policy-making. Be specific and provide examples.****Please include 4 referenced Scholarly articles*****

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get 10% Discount! Use Code "Newclient"

DQ response 2

/in /by

Rachel QuintelaPosted DateMar 17, 2022, 4:33 PM(edited)UnreadPreoperative cardiovascular risk assessment requires a thorough history, physical examination, and determination of daily functional capacity to identify signs and symptoms of coronary ischemia, heart failure, and coronary or valve disease (Smilowitz & Berger, 2017). Risk calculators, such as the Revised Cardiac Risk Index (RCRI), identify patients with low risk (2 mg/dL (Dakik, Sbaity, Msheik, Kaspar, Eldriani, Chehab, Hassan, Mailhac, Makki & Tamim, 2020).The American University of Beirut (AUB‐HAS2) Cardiovascular Risk Index is a recently developed method of calculating preoperative cardiovascular risk. It is derived from 6 elements: history of heart disease, symptoms of angina or dyspnea, age ≥75 years, hemoglobin <12 mg/dL, vascular surgery, and emergency surgery (Dakik et al., 2020). Several large scale studies have found the AUB-HAS2 superior to the more commonly used RCRI in a broad range of surgical subpopulations (Dakik et al., 2020).Cardiovascular testing is rarely indicated in low risk patients, though stress testing may be considered in patients at higher risk (determined by the inability to climb ≥2 flights of stairs) if and when the results from the testing would change the perioperative medical, anesthesia, or surgical approaches (Smilowitz & Berger, 2017).Recently, my preceptor and I had a patient needing clearance prior to a surgeon's recommendation of small bowel resection secondary to obstruction. My preceptor demonstrated how to use both the RCRI and the AUB-HAS2; both modalities suggested a low risk of adverse cardiac events and so the patient was cleared for surgery. The gentleman had the procedure and recovered well with no unexpected events and was discharged home on post-op day 6.ReferencesDakik, H. A., Sbaity, E., Msheik, A., Kaspar, C., Eldriani, M., Chehab, O., Hassan, O. A., Mailhac, A., Makki, M. & Tamim, H. (2020). AUB-HAS2 cardiovascular risk index: Performance in surgical subpopulations and comparison to the revised cardiac index. Journal of the American Heart Association, 9(10). https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.119.016228.Smilowitz, N. R. & Berger, J. S. (2020). Perioperative cardiovascular risk assessment and management of noncardiac surgery: A review. JAMA, 324(3), 279-290. doi:10.1001/jama.2020.7840.REPLYAMAmelia Mangunereplied toRachel Quintela

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get 10% Discount! Use Code "Newclient"