Mischel & Shoda, Response to fellow classmate – Stella Duru Week 5 DQ 1 help

Mischel & Shoda, (1995) acknowledged the fact that the grounds that brought about cognitive revolution in psychology was established three decades ago. With specific variables to help in the study of how an individual responds to stimuli, and using that to construct a behavioral pattern. Variables which included “the individual’s encodings or construal (of self, other people, situations); expectancies (about outcomes and one’s own efficacy); subjective values; competencies (for the construction and generation of social behavior); and self-regulatory strategies and plans in the pursuit of goals” (Mischel & Shoda, 1995.pg.252). However they pointed out that in the past psychologist tried to connect why an individual’s behavior does not often relate to the situation they find themselves, nor could they provide supportive data to prove that “with the fundamental assumption and intuitive conviction that personality must be stable on the other hand”(pg.256). Mischel & Shoda, (1995) explained that the cognitive-affective system theory of personality breaks away from such misconceptions, by the acceptance of the fact that an individual’s behavior varies due to the uniqueness of the personality system. By predicting that an individual’s behavior depending on the environment will change from one situation to another. And backed by todays modern computers which provide near-perfect simulations, the computer provided a successful illustration of how “Individual differences in the patterns of activation pathways among the internal representations determine the relationship between the situation features and the observed behavioral outcomes from the system” (Mischel & Shoda, 1995.pg.256).

Please respond to the above question using 150-250 words. No references are needed unless you want to use them, If you do use a reference please cite in APA 6th edition format.

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get 10% Discount! Use Code "Newclient"