The following post is from another student to wish i have to reply adding some extra information. less than 20 % similarity   3 paragraph

Validity and feasibility are measures of importance of data collected based on the tools used for this purpose. Validity refers to the extent to which a tool of data collection measures what it should measure. A valid tool should ensure that the differences found within the tools of measurements reflect true differences among what is measured. Feasibility is the measure of whether a study can be done by the use available resources. Feasibility considers a variety of factors including availability of time, study participants, cooperation by other, presence of equipment and facilities, availability of money and the experience of the researcher (Polit & Beck, 2017). In mixed method research, it is possible to achieve both validity and feasibility of research.

The mixed method is an approach to research that integrates qualitative and quantitative data in one study of through a coordination of a number of cluster studies. Mixed method research is important for eliminating contradictions between qualitative findings and quantitative results (Parvaiz, Mufti & Wahab, 2016). By reflecting the viewpoints of participants, the mixed method approach ensures that study findings are grounded in the experiences of participants.

To ensure validity and feasibility, the mixed method research uses two or more methods to collect data. As such, if any of these two methods has a problem with validity, they can be counterbalanced through triangulation (Gibson, 2017). Secondly, through complementarity, the mixed method approach, the researcher can avoid limitations with one method and ensure feasibility of their research. Thirdly, by incrementality, the researcher can use qualitative research through qualitative research and test using the quantitative approach (Polit & Beck, 2017). As such, there is an enhanced validity as the model or hypothesis is supported by multiple and complementary data types.

References

Gibson, C. B. (2017). Elaboration, generalization, triangulation, and interpretation: On enhancing the value of mixed method research. Organizational Research Methods, 20(2), 193-223.

Parvaiz, G. S., Mufti, O., & Wahab, M. (2016). Pragmatism for mixed method research at higher education level. Business & Economic Review, 8(2), 67-79.

Polit, D. & Beck, C. (2017). Nursing research: Generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer Health.

 Congratulations! You have recently been promoted and are the company’s new Human Resources Manager! You have offices in several countries, so how would you evaluate different compensation packages for employees who are located throughout the world?

Note: Need around 600 words, In-textcontext references, references.

  Exploring Different Types of Assessments [WLO: 1] [CLOs: 2]
Prepare

Prior to beginning work on this discussion,

• Read Chapter 1.2: Purposes and Types of Assessment
• Read Chapter 5: Placement, Diagnostic, and Formative Assessment
• Read Chapter 6: Summative Assessment
• Choose one of the following websites or use Microsoft Word to create your infographic for this discussion:
  • Piktochart (Links to an external site.)
  • Venngage (Links to an external site.)
  • Canva (Links to an external site.)

Reflect

As you read Chapters 1.2, 5, and 6 in your text, take notes that helps you identify the following:

• What are the four types of assessments?
• What are the purposes for each type of assessment? When are they typically used in teaching?
• What are some specific examples of each type of assessment?

Write (Post Initial Response by Thursday, Day 3)

Complete the following:

• Create an infographic using one of the links provided in the “Prepare” section of the discussion prompt. In your infographic, include the following (be sure this is all in your own words, you are paraphrasing what you have read):
  • A description of each type of assessment: Placement, Diagnostic, Formative, and Summative
  • The purposes for each type of assessment and when it is used within instruction
  • Two to three examples of each type of assessment
• Share your infographic by providing a link in the discussion thread or attaching your Microsoft Word document. Double-check that your link accesses your infographic.
• Provide a reflection based on the following question:
  • Which type of assessment (placement, diagnostic, formative, or summative) do you think is most important with regards to student learning? Provide specific reasoning for your choice by making reference to your readings.

Guided Response (Due Monday, Day 7): Post replies to at least two peers by the close date of this discussion. Examine your peers’ infographics and provide feedback on the content. How were their examples accurate? Share additional examples. What areas could you provide further guidance on?

Though two replies are the basic expectation, for deeper engagement and learning, you are encouraged to provide responses to any comments or questions others have given to you. Remember, continuing to engage with peers and the instructor will further the conversation and provide you with opportunities to demonstrate your content expertise, critical thinking, and real-world experiences with this topic.