Try to attempt to take the conversation further by examining their claims or arguments in more depth or responding to the posts that they make to you. Keep the discussion on target and try to analyze things in as much detail as you can. 100 words or more.
Virtue ethics thinks that all of your actions should make you liberal person. In contrast to utlitarians, who make decisions based on the consequences, virtue ethics like for things to be as clean as possible. In Hill’s article pertaining to environmental ethics, he states that there are basically two type of humans. He states that there are those which who assume that the environment was placed here for us as humans to use for our own personal well being and then those whom think of the environment as being loved and place it above all their personal aspirations. I personally think that environmental virtues sermons all maters that is taking place, for example, reverencing our plants and animals and furthermore caring for the environment. Virtue is about your actions being as pure as possible. So for a person which wants to do something but do not have the will to do so, a virtue ethicist would say that this person allowed their emotions to get in the way of them doing what is truly reasonable or even knowing what is reasonable may consist of. So therefore their works are dead.